The True Cost of Prior Authorization, And How to Reduce It

The True Cost of Prior Authorization, And How to Reduce It

0 Mins Read

The True Cost of Prior Authorization, And How to Reduce It

Share

The healthcare industry is in a constant state of flux, always evolving to meet new demands and challenges. One area that consistently demands attention and adaptation is revenue cycle management (RCM). As healthcare leaders and RCM teams look to the future, they're doing their due diligence to stay on top of the latest trends not just to be "trendy," but because these advancements are crucial for maintaining financial stability, accelerating revenue, reducing denials, and delivering quality patient care. It's about staying competitive and ensuring your organization thrives in a changing industry.

Among the many intricate processes within RCM, prior authorization (PA) stands out as a significant hurdle. It's widely recognized as the "big one" due to its "immensity and complexity," posing a considerable financial challenge for providers. This challenge stems from the fact that PA "raises the costs of resources" required to complete these processes and frequently lacks "standardization". It's a problem that's causing many organizations to struggle to get their claims paid, and it's even catching legislative attention. But what exactly makes prior authorization so costly and complex, and how can healthcare organizations effectively reduce its burden?

The "Immensity and Complexity" of Prior Authorization: A Growing Industry Problem

Prior authorization is a mechanism created by payers to determine if a requested medical service, medication, or test is medically necessary and appropriate. Its purpose extends to ensuring the most economical treatment option is considered, preventing duplicated services, and verifying if ongoing treatments are still beneficial for the patient. While these intentions aim to promote patient safety and control healthcare costs, the process itself has become a major administrative burden.

For providers, prior authorization is often considered the "big one" due to its sheer scale and intricacy. It's a pervasive requirement across many different services, and the manual effort involved in navigating it drains valuable resources. Organizations must contend with significant costs associated with the staff time and administrative infrastructure dedicated to obtaining PAs. This complexity is exacerbated by the lack of a uniform approach across different payers. Each insurance company can have its own unique set of rules, portals, and requirements, creating a fragmented and confusing landscape for healthcare teams.

As one expert puts it:

"This is a big conversation right now in the industry because some of the processes that providers, organizations, hospitals, all across the board, if you're having to do anything with prior authorization, it is complex and therefore it raises the costs of resources that you're using to complete those processes. Sometimes it's confusing what the payer requirements are and there is no standardization for it so that makes it also more challenging."

This significant lack of standardization and the sheer volume of unique payer requirements create a ripple effect. Healthcare organizations find themselves "struggling to get their claims paid" because even minor errors or delays in the PA process can lead to denials, disrupting cash flow and increasing the "cost to collect". The administrative burden not only affects financial stability but also diverts staff away from direct patient care, impacting the overall efficiency of the revenue cycle. It's clear that finding solutions to streamline prior authorization is not just about financial health, but about optimizing the entire healthcare ecosystem.

The Manual Burden: Deconstructing the Traditional Prior Authorization Process

Before diving into prior authorization, it's helpful to understand a few related terms that are often used interchangeably but actually have distinct meanings. These terms, while sometimes confusing, are all designed to compare recommended treatments with industry practices, approve necessary treatments, promote patient safety, minimize costs, and prevent unnecessary procedures.

Let's break down these common pre-service requirements:

  • Referral: A referral is a written order from a primary care doctor for a patient to see a specialist or receive specific medical services. Typically required by Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) plans, it’s fundamentally a physician-to-physician conversation for permission. While a patient might receive a physical piece of paper, the actual transaction often occurs through a payer portal, where the primary care physician (PCP) submits the necessary information. It is the provider’s responsibility to secure this referral so services are considered for payment. If a referral is not obtained, or a claim is denied due to a missing referral, the patient is often held financially responsible. Unlike other processes, a referral does not involve a payer approval, making it distinct from prior authorization.

  • Pre-certification: Pre-certification occurs before inpatient admissions and select ambulatory procedures or services. Its primary purpose is to secure a coverage decision before the procedures, services, or supplies are provided. This process helps identify members for enrollment in specialty programs, such as case management, disease management, or behavioral health, and may necessitate notification or a specific coverage determination. Pre-certification requests can be submitted through Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) using the 278 transaction set, also known as healthcare services review. It’s important to note that pre-certification is generally distinct from prior authorization, despite being sometimes mistakenly used interchangeably.

  • Pre-determination: This involves a formal review of a patient’s requested medical care. Pre-determination is an optional, recommended step for experimental, investigational, or cosmetic services, and it is not required if prior authorization is already necessary. Its goal is to confirm whether the service meets medical necessity requirements and will be covered and reimbursed. Similar to prior authorization, clinical information often needs to be submitted. A key difference, however, is the payer response time, which can range from 30 to 60 days, meaning this process is typically completed well in advance of the procedure being scheduled. For elective services, pre-determination helps both the patient and provider decide whether to proceed with the treatment.

  • Prior Authorization (PA): As mentioned, this is "the big one". Prior authorization is designed to determine medical necessity for certain procedures, medications, or tests, except in emergency situations. Payers use it to ensure a service or treatment plan is appropriate, follows up-to-date recommendations, and represents the most economical option available. They also scrutinize whether the service is being delivered in the appropriate setting (e.g., an ambulatory surgery center versus a hospital). Furthermore, PA helps prevent the duplication of expensive procedures and evaluates if ongoing or recurrent services, like physical therapy, are still benefiting the patient. While PA generally looks at whether a benefit is covered under the patient's health plan, it's advisable to conduct a separate eligibility and benefit check, as the information received during PA might not always be comprehensive regarding benefit coverage.

The prior authorization process is inherently complex, leading to increased costs and a lack of standardization across the industry. This complexity is a major reason why organizations frequently struggle to get their claims paid.

A critical point to remember regarding prior authorization is the responsibility for obtaining it:

"First of all, one thing to keep in mind is that prior off is the responsibility of the provider. And again, this is what makes it financially challenging as well because if a denial is received and they are unable to reverse that denial, the patient cannot be held responsible for that prior authorization unless there is some kind of caveat in the contract either between the provider and the payer or a caveat in the patient's benefit plan."

The traditional manual PA process generally involves several steps:

  1. Initial Checks: The first step is to determine if prior authorization is even required for a specific procedure, supply, or drug. This is typically done by checking payer portals, making phone calls to insurers, reviewing payer-provided documents, or sometimes using automated EDI authorization systems.

  2. Information Gathering: If authorization is required, the next step is to gather all the necessary information for the request. This can range from basic billing data—such as diagnosis codes, CPT codes, provider information, and place of service—to extensive medical documentation, including details about previous services, current services, and the patient's complete health profile.

  3. Submission: Once all the required information is compiled, the request is submitted. Submission methods vary widely and can include phone calls, payer portals, email, fax, or EDI transactions.

  4. The "Waiting Game": After submission, providers enter a waiting period, which typically lasts five to ten days for a response. The response could be an approval, a denial, a request for additional information, or a suggestion for a less costly but equally effective alternative treatment.

  5. Claim Submission: If an approval is received and a prior authorization number is assigned, this number must then be included on the claim when it is submitted to the payer.

  • Retro Authorization: This occurs when authorization is obtained after services have already been rendered. Retro authorization is typically initiated in response to a denial (e.g., if a claim was denied for a missing PA, or if changes were made to the original service parameters like CPT codes, diagnosis codes, or location). Like initial PAs, obtaining retro authorizations is the provider's responsibility. It's crucial for providers to be aware of the often tight timelines for submitting retro authorization requests, which can range from as little as 48 hours to up to six months, depending on the payer. Diligent tracking of payer guidelines is essential to ensure submissions are made within these critical timeframes.

This detailed, often manual, process for prior authorizations and related activities highlights the significant inefficiencies and resource drain that healthcare organizations face daily.

AI as the Strategic Antidote: Revolutionizing Prior Authorization Workflows

The good news is that the healthcare industry is increasingly embracing artificial intelligence (AI) and automation to tackle these challenges. About 80% of healthcare executives are already increasing their spending on IT and software to leverage AI technologies, including powerful tools like generative AI. These tools are designed to dramatically improve efficiency, optimize workflows, and minimize errors across various RCM areas, including patient registration, eligibility verification, claims processing, denials management, and payment posting.

This is where advanced solutions, specifically Agentic AI, come into play, offering a revolutionary approach to prior authorization workflows. Unlike traditional Robotic Process Automation (RPA) tools, which can be rigid, expensive to maintain, and prone to breaking when encountering unexpected scenarios, Agentic AI operates with a human-like understanding of context and adaptability. It's like having a self-driving car for your RCM processes—it understands the goal, course-corrects when needed, and learns over time.

Magical, for example, leverages Agentic AI to transform complex, repetitive workflows into scalable automations that can run entirely without human intervention. This kind of AI-powered automation is making it incredibly easy to set up workflows in minutes, compared to the months often required for traditional RPA.

Here’s how Agentic AI directly addresses the pain points of prior authorization:

  • Automated Requirement Verification and Payer-Specific Rule Engines: One of the biggest time-sinks in the manual PA process is identifying if authorization is even needed and understanding the specific, often confusing, requirements of each payer. Agentic AI can automate this complex task effortlessly. It uses reasoning models and real-time data retrieval to make decisions, just like a human would. This means an AI agent can quickly navigate payer portals, cross-reference rules, and determine precise requirements, ensuring that no stone is left unturned and all payer-specific guidelines are met. This capability drastically reduces the manual research time and the risk of errors that lead to denials. Agentic AI is designed to understand and adapt to the nuances of complex RCM processes, including analyzing unstructured data and making decisions based on various factors.

  • Intelligent Data Extraction and Automated Submission for Faster Processing: Gathering the extensive medical documentation and billing information required for PA submissions is a labor-intensive step. Magical's Agentic AI excels in intelligent PDF processing, allowing it to extract data from any PDF, whether it's medical records or insurance forms, and instantly populate it into online forms. This includes capabilities for smart data transformation, handling date conversions, text extraction, formatting, and real-time data cleanup, eliminating the need for manual cleanup. This intelligent data handling and automated submission drastically cut down the time spent on preparing and submitting PA requests, accelerating the entire process and moving data between systems without human input.

  • Proactive Denial Prevention and Efficient Denial Management: The rise in denials is a constant headache for healthcare providers, often caused by errors in patient information, insufficient documentation, or prior authorization issues. Agentic AI offers AI-powered resilience, meaning its agents adapt to changes and handle edge cases automatically, ensuring automations run reliably. This includes self-healing workflows and robust error handling. By automating claims processing, payment posting, and follow-up with high accuracy, Agentic AI can significantly reduce manual errors that lead to denials. Should a denial occur, the system's comprehensive automation logs and daily automated testing provide detailed reports, enabling efficient management and appeals. This proactive and adaptive approach helps to get denials under control and increase the likelihood of recovery.

  • Reducing Manual Intervention and Optimizing Resource Allocation: The ultimate benefit of Agentic AI in prior authorization is its ability to free the global workforce of mundane, soul-crushing tasks. By automating time-consuming and repetitive workflows, Agentic AI employees allow human RCM teams to focus on higher-value, strategic, and creative endeavors. Magical uses AI to observe your team's workflows and automatically flag opportunities for automation, making it easy to identify where the most significant impact can be made. This shift not only boosts efficiency by over 50% but also empowers RCM staff to dedicate their expertise to resolving complex issues, improving patient financial engagement, and enhancing overall patient satisfaction.

If you're looking to transform your prior authorization processes and empower your team, Magical's Agentic AI offers a powerful solution. Book a demo today to see how fully autonomous, self-driving automations can simplify your most complex RCM workflows and help you gain a competitive advantage.

Measuring Success: Quantifying the ROI of AI in Prior Authorization

Implementing AI and automation in prior authorization isn't just about reducing administrative burden; it's about achieving measurable financial and operational success that impacts the entire organization.

  • Driving Down "Cost to Collect" and Improving Financial Outcomes: By streamlining and automating processes, AI directly contributes to a significant reduction in administrative costs. The efficiency gains mean fewer resources are tied up in manual PA tasks, which directly lowers the "cost to collect" for each claim. This financial optimization is evident in improved margins and accelerated revenue. As Keith Favreau, Director of Product at WebPT, notes, "We increased revenue by decreasing billing errors and by speeding up patient charting by 25%.". This highlights how automating tasks leads to fewer mistakes and faster processing, both of which are critical for financial health.

  • Accelerating Revenue Flow and Enhancing Claim Payment Rates: One of the most critical impacts of AI-driven prior authorization is the acceleration of cash flow. Faster processing and more accurate submissions mean quicker approvals and fewer denials, leading to claims being paid more promptly. Agentic AI's ability to ensure claims are accurate the first time and to adapt to changing requirements significantly enhances claim payment rates. This reliable and efficient flow of revenue is essential for maintaining financial stability in a challenging healthcare landscape.

  • Empowering RCM Staff to Focus on Higher-Value Tasks: Perhaps one of the most transformative benefits of AI automation is its impact on human capital. By taking over the tedious, repetitive, and time-consuming tasks associated with prior authorization, Agentic AI frees up your RCM staff to focus on activities that require human judgment, empathy, and strategic thinking. This could include complex denial appeals, patient financial counseling, or proactive problem-solving that directly enhances patient satisfaction and engagement. It allows healthcare professionals to dedicate themselves more fully to patient care, which is the ultimate mission of any healthcare organization.

Putting AI to Work for Your RCM

The evolving landscape of healthcare revenue cycle management demands innovative solutions to navigate the "immensity and complexity" of processes like prior authorization. By embracing AI and automation, particularly sophisticated Agentic AI platforms like Magical, healthcare organizations can transform their RCM workflows from burdensome manual processes into seamless, efficient, and financially healthy operations.

The strategic adoption of AI offers a clear path to reducing the true cost of prior authorization—not just by cutting expenses, but by accelerating revenue, empowering staff, and ultimately allowing your organization to focus more on what truly matters: delivering exceptional patient care. It's about making smart, data-driven decisions that support the financial well-being of your facility and ensure patients have a smooth financial experience.

Ready to experience the magic of intelligent automation in your revenue cycle? Book a free demo to learn more about how Magical can work with your systems and help you automate your revenue cycle workflows today.

Make tasks disappear.
Like magic.

Slash through repetitive tasks in seconds by teleporting data between your tabs.

Chrome Store · 4.6 stars · 3,200+ reviews